What can government do to bitcoin

what can government do to bitcoin

But the U. Haseeb Qureshi Oct It is based on the reality that central bank tinkering with the money supply has induced recessions, exacerbated unemployment, and given rise to a global banking system based on profiteering and corruption. Also, I hold a modest amount of bitcoin with no short positions and therefore have no interest in spreading FUD. This is not nearly as clear as it seems. Your Practice.

Got a tip?

During the opening portion of the interview, Ammous was asked about a recent research bulletin he released around the topic of what it would take to kill Bitcoin, in particular from the perspective of a government attack. Governments could have a variety of reasons for implementing a Bitcoin ban. Anything from the existence of darknet markets to the protection of the local fiat currency could be used as justification for such a decision. Ammous went on to explain that governments that clamp down on the use of Bitcoin with strict regulations are likely to also already be restrictive in terms of what people are allowed govvernment do with their own finances more generally. Ammous added that it becomes clearer to bitoin that they are not in control of their own money in the traditional banking system every time a new economic crisis pops up in different parts governnment the world. According to Ammous, the most efficient way for governments to kill Bitcoin would be to compete with it.

Get the Latest from CoinDesk

what can government do to bitcoin

Bitcoin, the Internet currency beloved by computer scientists, libertarians, and criminals, is no longer invulnerable. As recently as 3 years ago, it seemed that anyone could buy or sell anything with Bitcoin and never be tracked, let alone busted if they broke the law. The majority of Bitcoin users are law-abiding people motivated by privacy concerns or just curiosity. The paradox of cryptocurrency is that its associated data create a forensic trail that can suddenly make your entire financial history public information. Read more of our special package that examines the hurdles and advances in the field of forensics.

The US could someday try to crack down on cryptocurrency by calling certain users financial institutions. Critics say that would be a terrible idea.

Surprising because IMF was started as this global central bank which could provide emergency funds to countries in need. Virtual currencies are in a different category, because they provide their own unit of account and payment systems.

Because they are too volatile, too risky, too energy intensive, and because the underlying technologies are not yet scalable. Many are too opaque for regulators; and some have been hacked. Not so long ago, some experts argued that personal computers would never be adopted, and that tablets would only be used as expensive coffee trays.

So I think it may not be wise to dismiss virtual currencies. For instance, think of countries with weak institutions and unstable national co. Instead of adopting the currency of another country—such as the U.

Call it dollarization 2. IMF experience shows that there is a tipping point beyond which coordination around a new currency is exponential. And yet, why might citizens hold virtual currencies rather than physical dollars, euros, or sterling? For instance, they could be issued one-for-one governmnet dollars, or a stable basket of currencies. So in many ways, virtual currencies might just give existing currencies and monetary policy a run for their money.

D article shows how bitcoin is being used in Venzuela as government has failed in providing a stable currency. The problem, according to Osorio, is that unlike Zimbabwe and other nations where hyperinflation has taken its toll, Venezuela does not have access to enough dollars to manage the economy. Locals have, therefore, turned completely to Bitcoin in order to function economically. Near the end of the segment, Osorio says:. Given this threat, what can the governments do? For starters, one must recognize that monetary demand — that is, the demand to use an item as a medium of exchange — is not quite like the demand for most other goods.

Monies are subject to network effects. I can enjoy a fine bathtub gin even if no one else does. But the usefulness of a would-be money like bitcoin depends crucially on whether other people are using it. We must coordinate beliefs.

If one does not believe others will use bitcoin, she will be less inclined to accept it. In general, governments might determine the medium of exchange by coordinating beliefs, employing transactions policy, and punishing users of alternatives. By declaring an item legal tender, for example, the government might create an especially salient focal point around which individuals can coordinate on a particular money. Legal tender status might be nothing more than a designation; it need not convey any special privileges under the law though sometimes it does.

Since I want to use the money you are using and you want to use the money I am using, simply stating that the dollar is legal tender and bitcoin is not legal tender might be enough to what can government do to bitcoin coordination on the dollar. As a large and powerful player in the economy, governments are often in a position to provide such a focal point. Of course, if the net gains from switching to bitcoin are greater than the costs of coordination, we might establish some competing focal point to coordinate on the superior alternative.

In this case, governments might resort to transactions policy — that is, committing to accept and spend its preferred money — in order what can government do to bitcoin prevent bitcoin from gaining widespread acceptance.

By collecting taxes and spending dollars and not bitcointhe government guarantees some demand for dollars and, correspondingly, limits gvoernment potential network size of bitcoin.

Some governments will not be able to determine the medium of exchange with transactions policy. Even if a government is not large enough to determine the medium of exchange via transactions policy, it still has one last trick up its sleeve: punishments.

By punishing those employing an alternative money, it lowers the expected benefits of the alternative and, hence, the relative demand for its preferred money. Fortunately, very few countries have taken steps to ban cryptocurrencies to date. But the threat is legitimate. Governments might not be able to prevent all cryptocurrency transactions, but they can significantly discourage their use.

With this in mind, we should continue to push for choice in currency. Fo should continue to explain the benefits of financial privacy and stateless monies. It is a second-best solution. In a world with powerful governments, it might be the best one can hope. All these readings are hardly new. The governments and people faced similar issues when paper currency etc started becoming di as money. Earlier, these were mainly offered by private players and then eventually governments using a mix of threats and incentives monpolised the business.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2. You can leave a responseor trackback from your own site. You are commenting bitconi your WordPress.

You are governmrnt using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Blog at WordPress. Mostly Economics This blog covers research work in Economics with focus on India. Rate this:. Like this: Like Loading Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.

Email required Address never made public. Name required. Post was not sent — check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Bitccoin find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy.

Andreas Antonopoulos explains why no government can attack Bitcoin.

Waiting for a confirmation

On a smaller scale, airlines reward miles function in a similar way, enabling travelers to purchase plane tickets, hotel rooms, and other items using airline miles as virtual currency. Putting the two side-by-side, our governmdnt financial system is far ahead of the UX of cryptocurrencies though I eagerly await the day that changes. That’s easier said than. Its founder credits Bitcoin for its what can government do to bitcoin. Russia issued a draft bill to ban cryptocurrencies in October and ccan rumors suggest it might follow. Raiden Network Sep Those fees generate a lot of revenue and a lot of jobs across the global banking industry. Your Money.

Comments